5

Web of Lies: Astroturfing Threatens The PR Business

Astroturfing is like the underbelly of the PR business – large, hidden, and when it pops out, really ugly. A decade ago, that kind of  fake grassroots campaigning was at the edge of public relations, and it happened primarily in politics. Today, the rise of social media has put a new spin on astroturfing, with faux reviews posted all over the Web. And, it’s more closely associated with what many of us in PR do on a daily basis

That’s why the recent settlement between the FTC and Reverb, the PR firm caught trying to game iTunes ratings with reviews by its own staff, is actually good for our industry. An expert quoted by the New York Times puts it more strongly. He says the settlement might be useful to PR firms who want to “resist clients who demand they play dirty.”

Wow. So, who is really responsible here? In this case, it seems like no one twisted arms at Reverb. MobileCrunch actually outed the firm last year for openly marketing its team of review-posting interns to help developers promote gaming apps. In settling with Reverb last week, the FTC warned again that paid endorsers, PR firms, and anyone benefiting through “material connections” must disclose the relationship.

And, Reverb isn’t alone. Anyone who frequents Yelp, amazon, or iTunes has learned to be skeptical of, um, creative writing. Last year, executives at Belkin were busted by The Daily Background for offering payment for positive reviews of its products, and for writing reviews themselves under anonymous handles. Retailer Ann Taylor was let off with an FTC warning after offering gift cards to bloggers in exchange for coverage. That was a move in the right direction, since previous guidelines had emphasized individual blogger responsibility.

But, the FTC hasn’t gone far enough with the latest wrist slap. To date, the penalty for astroturfing has been modest public humiliation. Maybe the risk of reputation damage. But though the Reverb case has, in fact, reverberated throughout our industry, no fine was involved, and the consent decree implies no wrongdoing. A hefty payment would be a more powerful deterrent. And, though Reverb seems the bad actor here, why not follow the money to the companies who actually subsidize the payola?

Only with real teeth in its regulations will the FTC will root out the bad Apples (pun intended.) In the meantime, if you’re shopping for apps, or gadgets, or just about anything, check out The Consumerist’s list of 30 Ways You Can Spot Fake Online Reviews. Let the buyer – and promoters – beware.


« | »
SHARE

Comments

  1. Gerry Casanova

    Thanks for your excellent post. Earlier today a reputable social media blogger advised marketers to offer their Facebook fans discounts/rewards in exchange for “like” endorsements. This tactic resembles your Ann Taylor example, and the expert’s post shows how easily questionable advice can seep into social PR/marketing. Social media invites experimentation, but always with integrity. Ignorance of the law (or best practices)is hardly an excuse for abuse. The PR industry has a bright future thanks to digital/social media, but only if we are informed and disciplined enough to use it well.

  2. Dorothy Crenshaw

    Thanks, Gerry. Yes, it’s a slippery slope, isn’t it? I actually hadn’t thought much about the Facebook incentive thing, but it’s a good point. Yet, in the typical FB contest or prize scenario, the fact that an incentive exists is disclosed, at least presumably. Believe it or not, I can actually understand employees posting their true experiences with a client’s app or game or whatever, and it can be a legitimate view that they’re sharing. But, the relationship needs to be disclosed. I think we’ll all be a bit more careful in the future.

Leave A Reply

  • (will not be published)

* Indicates required field

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>